/* * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the * License, or (at your option) any later version. * * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU Library General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public * License along with this program (see the file COPYING.LIB for more * details); if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., * 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */ package org.dcache.chimera; import javax.sql.DataSource; import java.util.EnumSet; import java.util.List; import org.dcache.acl.enums.AceFlags; import org.dcache.acl.enums.RsType; public class HsqlDBFsSqlDriver extends FsSqlDriver { public HsqlDBFsSqlDriver(DataSource dataSource) throws ChimeraFsException { super(dataSource); } @Override void removeTag(FsInode dir) { /* Get the tag IDs of the tag links to be removed. */ List<String> ids = _jdbc.queryForList("SELECT itagid FROM t_tags WHERE inumber=?", String.class, dir.ino()); if (!ids.isEmpty()) { /* Remove the links. */ _jdbc.update("DELETE FROM t_tags WHERE inumber=?", dir.ino()); /* Remove any tag inode of of the tag links removed above, which are * not referenced by any other links either. * * We ought to maintain the link count in the inode, but Chimera has * not done so in the past. In the interest of avoiding costly schema * corrections in patch level releases, the current solution queries * for the existence of other links instead. * * The statement below relies on concurrent transactions not deleting * other links to affected tag inodes. Otherwise we could come into a * situation in which two concurrent transactions remove two links to * the same inode, yet none of them realize that the inode is left * without links (as there is another link). * * One way to ensure this would be to use repeatable read transaction * isolation, but PostgreSQL doesn't support changing the isolation level * in the middle of a transaction. Always running any operation that * might call this method with repeatable read was deemed unacceptable. * Another solution would be to lock the tag inode at the beginning of * this method using SELECT FOR UPDATE. This would be fairly expensive * way of solving this race. * * For now we decide to ignore the race: It seems unlikely to run into * and even if one does, the consequence is merely an orphaned inode. */ _jdbc.batchUpdate("DELETE FROM t_tags_inodes i WHERE itagid = ? " + "AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM t_tags t WHERE t.itagid=i.itagid LIMIT 1)", ids, ids.size(), (ps, tagid) -> ps.setString(1, tagid)); } } /** * * copy all directory tags from origin directory to destination. New copy marked as inherited. * * @param orign * @param destination */ @Override void copyTags(FsInode orign, FsInode destination) { _jdbc.update("INSERT INTO t_tags (inumber,itagid,isorign,itagname) (SELECT ?,itagid,0,itagname from t_tags WHERE inumber=?)", destination.ino(), orign.ino()); } @Override void copyAcl(FsInode source, FsInode inode, RsType type, EnumSet<AceFlags> mask, EnumSet<AceFlags> flags) { int msk = mask.stream().mapToInt(AceFlags::getValue).reduce(0, (a, b) -> a | b); int flgs = flags.stream().mapToInt(AceFlags::getValue).reduce(0, (a, b) -> a | b); _jdbc.update("INSERT INTO t_acl (inumber,rs_type,type,flags,access_msk,who,who_id,ace_order) " + "SELECT ?, ?, type, BITANDNOT(flags, ?), access_msk, who, who_id, ace_order " + "FROM t_acl WHERE inumber = ? AND BITAND(flags, ?) > 0", ps -> { ps.setLong(1, inode.ino()); ps.setInt(2, type.getValue()); ps.setInt(3, msk); ps.setLong(4, source.ino()); ps.setInt(5, flgs); }); } }