/* * Copyright (c) 1999, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any * questions. */ /* * @test * @bug 4099995 4118025 * @summary Bad optimization of "switch" statement * @author dps * * @run clean Switch1 * @run compile -O Switch1.java * @run main Switch1 */ public class Switch1 { public static void main (String argc[]) { for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { String ret; ret = test(0); if (ret.equals("Error")) throw new RuntimeException("test(0) = Error"); System.out.println("test(0) = " + ret); ret = test(1); if (ret.equals("Error")) throw new RuntimeException("test(1) = Error"); System.out.println("test(1) = " + ret); } } private static String test (int i) { switch (i) { case 0: return ("found 0"); case 1: return ("found 1"); } return ("Error"); } }