/* * Copyright 2006-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, * CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or * have any questions. */ /* * @test * @bug 6468384 6278587 * @summary Problem with underconstrained type variables * @compile T6468384.java */ import java.util.*; public class T6468384 { public class A {}; public class B extends A {}; public <T, V extends T> Set<T> newSet(V... objects) { Set<T> set = new LinkedHashSet<T>(); for (T t : objects) { set.add(t); } return set; } public static void main(String... args) { T6468384 g = new T6468384(); // B << V => V :> B // so B is inferred for V // Then consider the return type: // Set<A> >> Set<T> => A = T // So A is inferred for T Set<A> set1 = g.newSet(g.new B()); Set<A> set2 = g.<A,B>newSet(g.new B()); } }