/*
* Copyright 2017 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package org.drools.testcoverage.functional;
import org.assertj.core.api.Assertions;
import org.drools.testcoverage.common.util.KieBaseUtil;
import org.drools.testcoverage.common.util.KieUtil;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.kie.api.KieServices;
import org.kie.api.io.Resource;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
/**
* Testing of duplicities in rule files.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724753
*/
public class DuplicityTest {
@Test
public void testTwoRulesWithSameNameInOneFile() {
try {
final Resource resource =
KieServices.Factory.get().getResources().newClassPathResource("rule-name.drl", getClass());
KieUtil.getKieBuilderFromResources(true, resource);
Assertions.fail("Builder should have had errors, two rules of the same name are not allowed in one file together!");
} catch (AssertionError e) {
// expected
LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass()).info("", e);
}
}
}