/*
* Copyright 2008 the original author or authors.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package samples.junit4.singleton;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.PrepareForTest;
import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner;
import samples.singleton.StaticService;
import static org.easymock.EasyMock.expect;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.powermock.api.easymock.PowerMock.*;
/**
* A simple test that asserts that it's possible execute a test from the same
* class that defines the logic to test.
*/
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest( { StaticService.class, LogicAndTestInSameClassTest.class })
public class LogicAndTestInSameClassTest {
private static String invokeMethod() {
return StaticService.say("hello");
}
@Test
public void assertThatTestAndInstanceCanBeInSameClass() throws Exception {
mockStatic(StaticService.class);
String expected = "Hello altered World";
expect(StaticService.say("hello")).andReturn("Hello altered World");
replayAll();
assertEquals(expected, LogicAndTestInSameClassTest.invokeMethod());
verifyAll();
}
}